Select all on this page
| ART : 32785 : Not available for external loan | |
| Proportionality, stringency and utility in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights | |
| English | |
| 20230900 | |
| Oxford University Press | |
| Letwin, Jeremy | |
| proportionality principle | international human rights law | judicial decisions | CoE. European Court of Human Rights | utilitarianism | morality | law | legal reasoning | public interest | legitimacy | decision making | CoE. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) | goals | human rights protection | prisoner rights | ECHR-8 | insemination, artificial | health services accessibility | Europe | United Kingdom | |
| Full text in open access | |
| Human rights law review ; vol. 23, no. 3 | |
| ART : 31046 : Not available for external loan | |
| A utilitarian account of Article 3 ECHR | |
| English | |
| 20220000 | |
| Brill | |
| Letwin, Jeremy | |
| absolute rights and freedoms | torture prevention | inhuman treatment | freedom from torture | judicial decisions | treaty interpretation | theoretical models | legal reasoning | CoE. European Court of Human Rights | inhuman treatment | case law | torture prevention | state obligations | legal reasoning | morality | ECHR-3 | CoE. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) | utilitarianism | absolute prohibition of torture | Europe | |
| European Convention on Human Rights law review ; vol. 3, no. 3 | |